Pages

Sunday, January 27, 2013

Literature and Technology

Computers--laptops and desktops. Tablets. Smart phones. Electronic bilboards. E-readers. Mp3 players. Bluetooth devices. SmartBoards.

Movies. Television. Netflix and Hulu. YouTube.

Facebook. Twitter. Instagram. Tumblr.

Welcome to the twenty-first century, a world in which technology reigns supreme. I personally have a love-hate relationship with technology. Some days, my cell phone (a regular one, not an android phone) and I get along just fine; some days I throw it at the couch. But it's been very interesting in the last few years watching literature persevere through the growth and development of technology.

To be honest, I wasn't crazy about the Kindle when it came out. I mean, really? You couldn't just get a real book?

Confession: I have an iBooks app on my iPod touch and a Kindle application on my laptop.

You gain a lot with an electronic reading device--space, weight in your backpack, the ability to take several books with you, everywhere, at all times. But you lose something, too. The ink and paper smell. The feel of the pages in your hand. The imprint of the title on the spine.

I took an intro-level literature class with our good friend Duck last semester. Reading the books is wonderful and beautiful and adventurous. Studying for tests on the books, though, are not so much fun. So, based on a quote from our professor, Duck and I found a way to blend literature and technology for the purpose of studying for our final exam.

Dr. Jones said one day, "A short story is a tweeted novel."

You have to know this particular literature professor. He routinely quotes Shakespeare in every day conversation. He was making a point of the length of novels and short stories, and the limited amount of space. It gave us (Lindsey and me) an idea. What if we turned the literature we'd read for class into a series of tweets?
 
Every writing professor I have ever had has stressed that good writing will NOT be able to be summarized in a few simple sentences.  

This was not a writing class.

So the brilliant Miss Lindsey went through all the works we'd read in the class, and summarized them in 140 characters or less. It's a brilliant way to study (not write, necessarily), and I suggest it.

Introduction to Literary Studies, works of:

#DarkerFace Augustus ends up doing exactly what everyone knew he would do and everyone is still a slave at the end. #howdythereimoedipustex

(The Darker Face of the Earth by Rita Dove)

#WomensShortStories Lady goes crazy for yellow wallpaper, another lady goes crazy for her dead bird, another lady goes crazy and people die.

(Great Short Stories by American Women, edited by Candace Ward)

#Winesburg Curtis likes shoulders, George is a good listener, #everyoneisagrotesquenomatterhowyoulookatit and Kate creeps on her students.

(Winesburg, Ohio by Sherwood Anderson)

#MuchAdo DonPedro is black, DonJohn wears his B T-shirt, Benedick is a player, Beatrice is a cynic, Claudio is a pansy, Hero is forgiving.

(Much Ado About Nothing by William Shakespeare)

#Frankenstein Rich kid spends too much time alone, becomes irresponsible father to zombie child, child kills everyone and is unhappy #prozac

(Frankenstein by Mary W. Shelley)

#RimeOfAMariner Creeper sailor must tell his drug-induced tail of maritime spirits and dead waterfowl to an innocent wedding guest. #opium

(Rime of the Ancient Mariner by Samuel Taylor Coleridge)

#Gawain&GreenKnight Green dude w/ #GIANTAX shows up. G accepts game and is tricked. Kisses another dude's wife, labeled a coward. #badnews

(Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, edited by Marie Borhoff)

#Patience #Jonah doesn't want to go to #Nineveh because they'll kill him. Ends up soggy and still incorrect.

(Patience, edited by Marie Borhoff)

PostScript, over a year after this was written: I'm not sure why I never published this. I guess I wanted to wrap it up with a nice little moral or take-away. Take from it what you will. Maybe literature and technology really can work together. 

-Finch

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Deductive Reasoning

It's been a year--exactly--since that fiction class that Karina and I took with Prof. Hougen and got the idea to start this blog. I haven't written much fiction since then--I guess getting eaten alive and spit out will do that to you. It's not so much that I can't write or don't have time to write as I don't have the time to write well.

I think that's an important distinction to make. I mean, I understand the other side of it, too. I have a writer friend who's always going on about forcing yourself to just write, write crap and worry about it later, but just get your words flowing. Only after you've written a bunch of junky words can you get down to business with the real ones.

That makes perfect sense to me. But I'm not a writer. I'm an ed major. I write for fun, and honestly, I really like doing things well. All the time last year in fiction class I had this gnawing urge to go sit in the student center and just watch people. Observe behaviors. Listen to conversations. I want to portray the world the way it really is, only in words.

I think that whether we, as writers, have time to sit and creep on people or not, whether we're writing our junky words or our beautiful ones, it is still very important to be observant. To see the world, to notice.

Confession: I've watched all six episodes of BBC's Sherlock in about three days. (Thank goodness for MLK day!)


Besides being transfixed by Benedict Cumberpatch's eyes (a different story entirely), I just love Sherlock Holmes. I read "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes" by Arthur Conan Doyle a few years back and was hooked. I loved seeing how Sherlock would solve the crime by paying attention to detail. (The TV show was an added, updated, and visual bonus.)

What would happen to our writing if we studied life the way Sherlock Holmes studies crime scenes? What would we notice about our friends, our classmates, our community?

As writers, making observations is important. As Christian writers, we have to be careful not to let these deductions turn into assumptions that could be faulty. But I think being detail oriented with our subjects and with our words would make our writing so much better.

What do you think?

-Finch